Trump Administration Rescinds Previous Commitments to OECD’s Global Minimum Tax
January 20 was a watershed moment for the OECD’s efforts to implement a Global Minimum Tax. More commonly known as Pillar Two, the Global Minimum Tax was an initiative to reduce tax evasion by Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) and ensure a fair split of tax revenue between cooperating countries. Champions of the initiative would argue that by setting a minimum tax rate, Pillar Two helps prevent multinational corporations from engaging in aggressive tax avoidance strategies, such as shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions, and stabilizes the global tax framework, avoiding competition via a “Race to the Bottom” by the jurisdictions in question.
Critics of Pillar Two hold diverse and often conflicting views. Common criticisms include concerns that the tax rate is insufficiently stringent, placing undue strain on small to medium-sized enterprises. Some argue that the rules are overly complex and encroach upon the sovereignty of participating countries. Additional objections highlight that the tax rate is too low and that increasing foreign taxes could result in reduced revenue for the U.S. Treasury due to an increase in foreign tax credits issued.
Among these critics is the Trump Administration. On January 20, 2025, President Trump enacted an Executive Order, effectively withdrawing from any commitments made between the Biden Administration and the OECD. The Memorandum preface states, “The OECD Global Tax Deal supported under the prior administration not only allows extraterritorial jurisdiction over American income but also limits our Nation’s ability to enact tax policies that serve the interests of American businesses and workers.”
Effective immediately, the order states that any commitments or agreements made previously will have no force or effect on the American legislative system until an act of Congress formally adopts such agreements. The memorandum goes on to say that the Secretary of the Treasury will, to protect the interests of American taxpayers, perform investigations into any foreign countries that are within compliance with existing tax treaties and if any such jurisdictions have enacted rules that disproportionately affect American taxpayers. The Secretary of the Treasury is expected to deliver these findings within 60 days of the order.
The ongoing debates between the U.S. and the OECD are complex and continuously evolving, making it challenging to keep track of developments, especially for those unfamiliar with both Pillar Two and U.S. international taxation.
Please contact our Global Business Services team with any questions or concerns regarding these regulations or any other international tax issue.
-
Josh Riker
Josh Riker is a Senior Tax Consultant in the firm’s Global Business Services practice and is responsible for assisting clients and adding depth in all areas of the firm’s international tax consulting services including preparing client calculations, international forms, IC-DISC tax returns, and transfer pricing documentation.
Recent Resources
-
Global Business ServicesFebruary 7, 2025
Key Compliance Insights on the IRS’s Simplified Streamlined Approach
by John Bodur, MBAIn the intricate world of international tax, transfer pricing remains a cornerstone and a significant challenge for multinational enterprises. The...
-
Global Business ServicesFebruary 3, 2025
Japanese Printer Manufacturer Transfer Pricing Study
by Jason Rauhe, CPAA world-renowned Japanese printer manufacturer, also known for microchip-processor and watch production, engaged McGuire Sponsel for a transfer pricing study.
-
Global Business ServicesJanuary 31, 2025
Final Regulations on Disregarded Payment Losses: Key Updates for U.S. Corporations with Foreign Disregarded Entities
by Catherine Yuan, CPAOn January 10, 2025, the U.S. Treasury and IRS finalized regulations (TD 10026) addressing disregarded payments that give rise to...
-
Global Business ServicesJanuary 24, 2025
Supreme Court Temporarily Allows Enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act
by Jason Rauhe, CPAThe U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily lifted a nationwide ban on enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), a law that...