In the intricate world of international tax, transfer pricing remains a cornerstone and a significant challenge for multinational enterprises. The IRS’s Simplified Streamlined Approach (SSA), introduced under Section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code, emerges as a procedural shortcut and a sophisticated compliance strategy.
A world-renowned Japanese printer manufacturer, also known for microchip-processor and watch production, engaged McGuire Sponsel for a transfer pricing study.
On January 10, 2025, the U.S. Treasury and IRS finalized regulations (TD 10026) addressing disregarded payments that give rise to deductions for foreign tax purposes. These rules introduce the concept of disregarded payment losses (DPL), which operate independently from the longstanding dual consolidated loss (DCL) rules.
The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily lifted a nationwide ban on enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), a law that requires certain businesses to report information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
An IC-DISC is a special-purpose U.S. corporation that encourages domestic companies to export their products or services. Acting as a sales commission agent to the export company, an IC-DISC entity will receive a commission annually, which is exempt from federal income tax.
In 1976, Congress enacted Section 999 to discourage U.S.-based businesses from engaging with Arab nations that were boycotting Israel. As part of this, an often overlooked form requires U.S. persons with operations in a “boycott country” to report their activities.
McGuire Sponsel partnered with a multinational software design company with operations in North and Latin America to renew their transfer pricing study, ensuring compliance with OECD and IRS requirements.
McGuire Sponsel partnered with a U.S.-based company specializing in engineering services. With subsidiaries in multiple countries and substantial international activities, the client has undergone significant structural changes, including several acquisitions and the liquidation of a subsidiary.
Transfer Pricing remains a cornerstone of international tax compliance, and as we approach 2025, significant updates are on the horizon. With proposed methodologies, evolving tariff structures, and regulatory changes reshaping the landscape, staying informed has never been more critical.
On December 26, a federal court of appeals officially reinstated an injunction blocking the reporting deadline for Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI). This came just days after a panel lifted the injunction.
Key Compliance Insights on the IRS's Simplified Streamlined Approach
In the intricate world of international tax, transfer pricing remains a cornerstone and a significant challenge for multinational enterprises. The IRS’s Simplified Streamlined Approach (SSA), introduced under Section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code, emerges as a procedural shortcut and a sophisticated compliance strategy. Here’s an analytical exploration of its framework, implications, and strategic value.
What is SSA?
At its essence, the SSA represents a methodology for determining arm’s length pricing in controlled transactions. Rooted in the IRS’s authority under Section 482 to prevent income distortion and tax avoidance, the SSA diverges from traditional transfer pricing methods by prioritizing administrative convenience without sacrificing accuracy. While anchored in benchmarking data, the SSA incorporates adjustments for material factual disparities between tested parties and comparables, ensuring alignment with the transactional net margin method (TNMM).
Why the SSA Matters
The SSA offers a compelling proposition of efficiency without compromise for businesses in the complex world of transfer pricing. Its value proposition unfolds across three dimensions:
- Cost: By preparing transfer pricing documentation mandates (e.g., Treasury Regulation § 1.6662-6) with targeted record-keeping, the SSA reduces the resource drain of compliance. Taxpayers need only maintain:
-
- Organizational charts and intercompany agreements,
-
- Financial metrics (e.g., three-year weighted average operating expense-to-net revenue ratios), and
-
- Evidence of transaction eligibility under the SSA’s scoping criteria.
- Risk Mitigation: The SSA’s predefined parameters, such as industry groupings and factor intensity classifications, create a structured framework for pricing, diminishing ambiguity and audit exposure.
- Potential Disputes: By aligning outcomes with the “best method” in most cases, the SSA preempts contentious adjustments, sparing businesses protracted disputes with tax authorities.
Election Process
To elect the SSA, taxpayers must:
- Submit a Formal Statement: Titled “Election to Apply the SSA,” filed with the original tax return.
- Detail Transactions: Include descriptions, participant entities (with tax IDs), and jurisdictional details. Transactions may be aggregated by product lines to avoid granular disclosure.
Documentation
The SSA’s documentation requirements emphasize conciseness over comprehensiveness.
Core Requirements:
- A narrative justifying transaction eligibility under the SSA’s scope.
- Financial statements segregating distribution and non-distribution activities.
- Pricing matrices reflecting industry groupings and factor intensity calculations.
- Documentation must be contemporaneous and producible within 30 days of an IRS request.
Considerations
The SSA’s applicability hinges on transaction simplicity. Higher-complexity activities (e.g., IP licensing, hybrid financing, manufacturing) remain tethered to traditional methods.
The SSA offers a more streamlined method for meeting compliance requirements, but it should not be viewed as a shortcut to bypass comprehensive transfer pricing documentation. While the SSA provides the potential for a less burdensome process for certain taxpayers, it does not eliminate the need for thorough documentation.
Businesses must still ensure that they maintain detailed and accurate records to demonstrate that their transfer pricing practices are consistent with arm’s length principles. The documentation requirements under SSA may be simplified compared to full transfer pricing documentation. Still, they remain rigorous, requiring a clear and substantiated analysis of intercompany transactions, pricing methods, and the economic and financial context. Therefore, even under the SSA, maintaining proper documentation is crucial for regulatory compliance and risk mitigation.
Please contact our Global Business Services team with any questions or concerns about these regulations or any other international tax issue.
John Bodur, MBA is a Manager in the firm’s Global Business Services practice and is responsible for assisting clients and adding depth in all areas of the firm’s international tax consulting services including transfer pricing, and the firm’s compliance expertise.
Recent Resources
-
Global Business ServicesJanuary 31, 2025
Final Regulations on Disregarded Payment Losses: Key Updates for U.S. Corporations with Foreign Disregarded Entities
by Catherine Yuan, CPAOn January 10, 2025, the U.S. Treasury and IRS finalized regulations (TD 10026) addressing disregarded payments that give rise to...
-
Global Business ServicesJanuary 24, 2025
Supreme Court Temporarily Allows Enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act
by Jason Rauhe, CPAThe U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily lifted a nationwide ban on enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), a law that...
-
Global Business ServicesJanuary 17, 2025
IC-DISC FAQs: Maximizing Export Incentives
by Megan HanAn IC-DISC is a special-purpose U.S. corporation that encourages domestic companies to export their products or services. Acting as a...
-
Global Business ServicesJanuary 10, 2025
Key Reporting Requirements for Engaging with Boycott Countries
by Greg Lambrecht, CPAIn 1976, Congress enacted Section 999 to discourage U.S.-based businesses from engaging with Arab nations that were boycotting Israel. As...